Main Profile

At A Glance

The Enemy of My Enemy

The Enemy of My Enemy: Distinguishing Fact from Fiction in the Relationship Between al-Qaeda and Iran On December 22, 2011 a U.S. District Court Judge ruled that Iran was liable for the 9/11 attack because al-Qaeda operatives allegedly were allowed to surreptitiously transit Iran prior to the attack. Recent Treasury Department terrorism designations have also alleged at least limited collaboration between al-Qaeda operatives and elements of the Iranian state. These developments challenge the widely held view that al-Qaeda and Iran are implacable enemies because of al-Qaeda's condemnation of Shi'a Muslims and its vicious attacks on Iran's Shi'a allies in Iraq and elsewhere. Critics of the Court's decision question the evidence in the 9/11 Commission report and have challenged the veracity of testimony presented during the court case, alleging that such connections are made to advance an argument favoring war with Iran. At a moment of heightened American tension with Iran, this event endeavors to responsibly parse the relationship between Iran and al-Qaeda and place it within the context of regional upheaval and al-Qaeda and Iran's strategic outlooks. On Twitter? Follow @afpakchannel and search for this discussion using the hash tag: #alqaedaandiran. Participants Featured Speakers Daniel Byman Professor at Georgetown University Director of Research at the Saban Center at Brookings Afshon Ostovar Research Analyst Center for Naval Analysis Moderator Brian Fishman Counterterrorism Research Fellow New America Foundation
Length: 01:26:22


Questions about The Enemy of My Enemy

Want more info about The Enemy of My Enemy? Get free advice from education experts and Noodle community members.

  • Answer